uche
LawyerCONSTITUTIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TO PRIVACY IN NIGERIA
June 7, 2021 in Civil Law, Criminal Law, Human Rights Law, International Law, Uncategorized
INTRODUCTION
The right to privacy is a fundamental human right enshrined in numerous constitutions of the countries of the world and into the international human rights instruments. It is essential to the protection of social dignity and forms the foundation of any democratic society. It also supports and reinforces other rights, such as freedom of expression, information, and association. The right to privacy embodies the presumption that individuals should have an area of autonomous development, interaction, and liberty, a “private sphere” with or without interaction with others, free from arbitrary State intervention and excessive unsolicited intervention by other uninvited individuals. This article aims to examine the provisions that guarantee the right to privacy under the Nigerian 1999 Constitution (as amended), international instruments applicable to Nigeria and the constitutional limitations of the right to privacy.
MEANING AND SCOPE OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY
According to Olomojobi,[1] the right of privacy implies “the exclusion of the public eye from prying into an individual’s affair. A crucial aspect of the right to privacy entails the right to protect one’s image and personality and the right to have unfettered access to control one’s zones of exclusivity, space, and confidential information. The right to privacy lies within the realm of self-ownership. It is the moral liberty of doing what an individual deems fit to be done with his/her individualism and keeping others outside the sphere of his/her self-ownership.” It also refers to the concept that one’s personal information is protected from public scrutiny.[2]
In NWALI V. EBSIEC & ORS[3] the court held that section 37 of the 1999 Constitution provides that “the privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, conversations and telegraphic communication telephone is guaranteed and protected”. It is clear from the text of the provision that it specifically mentioned the types of privacy that it protects. Five of them are listed therein as follows- 1. The privacy of citizens 2. The privacy of their homes 3. The privacy of their correspondence 4. The privacy of their telephone conversations 5. The privacy of their telegraphic communication. This was restated by the Court in Federal Republic of Nigeria V. Daniel (2011) 4 ELR 4152 where the court held “Undoubtedly, by virtue of the Provision of Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution, the privacy of every Nigerian citizen, the home, correspondence, telephonic and telegraphic communications are cherishingly guaranteed and protected…”
RIGHT TO PRIVACY UNDER THE 1999 CONSTITUTION
In Nigeria, the right to privacy is one among many of the fundamental human rights guaranteed by the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution provides that: “The privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, telephone conversations and telegraphic communications is hereby guaranteed and protected.”
According to Lloyd Megwara,[4] the right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution entails the right to private life encompassing the right to live in isolation of others, (a reclusive life if you like), the right to protect one’s social, interpersonal relationships, (inclusive of sexual and marital relationships) the right of concealment of one’s nudity, (body anatomy) from public glare and the right of an individual over his own body (inclusive of what goes in and out of his body). It follows that the right to privacy implies the right to protect one’s body from unauthorized intrusion or invasion.
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
The constitution under section 45 contemplated the restriction on and derogation from fundamental human rights under the chapter. The section reads:
“Nothing in sections 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 of this Constitution shall invalidate any law that is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society (a) in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health; or (b) for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom or other persons”.
Section 45 received judicial endorsement in the case of OJOMA V. STATE[5] where the court held:
“The invasion of the house of the native doctor (Chibuike) is unlawful as it violates his fundamental human right to the privacy of his person and his home guaranteed him by S.37 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The only permitted derogation from this right is one provided for in law in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality, or public health, or for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons as required by S. 45(1) of the same 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. Privacy at its most fundamental level is the right to be left alone. This suggests that a zone surrounds every individual within which he or she should be protected from intrusion by others. It is the most valuable of all rights. The 1999 Constitution in S. 37 absolutely guarantees the privacy of the citizen, his home, correspondence, telephone conversations and telegraphic communications and S. 45(1) allows a law to derogate from it only if it is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality, or public health or for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons. Learned Counsel for the appellant has not referred to any law that enabled them to invade that house the way they did. For police crime prevention and control action in entering a building or the space of a person as in this case to be brought under the protection of S.45(1) of the 1999 Constitution, it must be considered a search in accordance with an enabling law.”
Therefore, based on the above authorities, the right to privacy guaranteed by section 37 of the 1999 Constitution is restricted to the following circumstances:
- the interest of defence.
- public safety.
- public order.
- public morality.
- public health; or
- to protect the rights and freedom of other persons
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Some important international instruments applicable in Nigeria will be highlighted to provide the meaning and scope of the right to privacy.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[6] guarantees the right to privacy for everyone. It provides that No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Right
Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Right[7] provides follows:
- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
- Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Convention on the Rights of the Child
Article 16 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child,[8] gives the right to privacy to every child in the world as follows:
- No child shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his or her honour and reputation.
- The child has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
The importance of the right to privacy can never be overemphasized. As can be noted from the above instruments, no there is no limitation clause to the right to privacy, this highlights the significance of the right to privacy in our day-to-day life.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights does not contain a direct provision which is directly protecting the right to privacy. However, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child[9] provides for every child in Africa with the right to privacy in Article 10 which reads:
No child shall be subject to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, or to the attacks upon his honour or reputation, provided that parents or legal guardians shall have the right to exercise reasonable supervision over the conduct of their children. The child has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
CONCLUSION
The right to privacy is a right of people to live to the exclusion of others and the ability to control the boundaries of public interference. As sacrosanct as this right is to the foundation of any democratic society, the right is accompanied by certain derogation and restriction to ensure that the society is governable and peaceful.
[1] Olomojobi, Yinka, Right to Privacy in Nigeria (October 31, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3062603 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062603
[2] Right to Privacy: Constitutional Rights & Privacy Laws | Live Science assessed 4th June 2021.
[3] (2014) LPELR-23682(CA)
[5] (2014) LPELR-22942(CA)
[6] Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations assessed 4th June 2021.
[7] Ch_IV_04.pdf (un.org) assessed 4th June 2021.
[8] Convention on the Rights of the Child text | UNICEF
[9] 36804-treaty-african_charter_on_rights_welfare_of_the_child.pdf (au.int) assessed 4th June 2021.
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN NIGERIA
June 3, 2021 in Government Advisory, Human Rights Law, Uncategorized
INTRODUCTION
The term “separation of powers” was coined by the French social and political philosopher Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu, in the 18th century in his publication, Spirit of the Laws.[1] According to him, the political authority of the state is divided into legislative, executive and judicial powers. He asserted that, to most effectively promote liberty, these three powers must be separate and acting independently.[2]
Separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another. The intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.
What is the separation of powers?
The concept of separation of powers as opined by Baron de Montesquieu suggests that:
Political liberty is to be found only when there is no abuse of power. To prevent this abuse, it is necessary from the nature of things that one power should check on another… When the legislative executive and judicial powers are united in the same person or body… There can be no liberty… Again there is no liberty if the judicial power is not separated from the legislative and executive …. There would be an end of everything if the same person or body, whether of nobles or of the people, were to exercise all three powers.[3]
To expound this concept, the Nigerian Supreme in Ugba v. Suswan held that: The Constitution sets up a federal system by dividing powers between the federal and state governments. It establishes a national government divided into three independent branches. The executive branch makes the law, while the judiciary explains the law. There is no document superior to the Constitution in Democratic Governance. It is the heart and soul of the people[4]
Separation of powers and the 1999 Constitution
The 1999 Constitution makes provision for the Separation of Powers of the 3 arms of Government in the Federal Republic of Nigeria. These provisions define, demarcate and allocate powers and responsibilities to the 3 arms of Government. We shall reproduce some of the relevant sections of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) that provide for the Separation of Powers between the 3 arms of Government that is the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary.
LEGISLATIVE POWERS
Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution (CFRN) provides for the powers of the Legislature in Nigeria. It provides that the Legislative powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall be vested in a National Assembly for the Federation, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.[5] They will have the power to make laws for the peace, order and good governance of the Federation. And power on all matters included in the Exclusive Legislative List set out in Part I of the Second Schedule to the Constitution.[6] The Legislative powers of a State of the Federation is vested in the House of Assembly of the State.[7]
EXECUTIVE POWERS
Section 5 CFRN provides that the Executive powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall be vested in the President and may subject to the provisions of any law made by the National Assembly, be exercised by him either directly or through the Vice-President and Ministers of the Government of the Federation or officers in the public service of the Federation.[8] The Executive powers shall extend to the execution and maintenance of the Constitution, all laws made by the National Assembly and to all matters with respect to which the National Assembly has, for the time being, power to make laws.[9]
While the Executive Powers of the Federation is vested with the President, at the state level, it is squarely vested with the governor of that state as provided by section 5(2) of the Constitution which reads:
‘Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive powers of a State: (a) shall be vested in the Governor of that State and may, subject as aforesaid and to the provisions of any Law made by a House of Assembly, be exercised by him either directly or through the Deputy Governor and Commissioners of the Government of that State or officers in the public service of the State (b) shall extend to the execution and maintenance of this Constitution, all laws made by the House of Assembly of the State and to all matters with respect to which the House of Assembly has for the time being power to make laws.’
The executive powers vested in a State above shall be exercised not to impede or prejudice the exercise of the Executive powers of the Federation, endanger any asset or investment of the Government of the Federation in that State or endanger the continuance of a Federal Government in Nigeria.
JUDICIARY POWERS
The powers of the Judicial arm of the Government are divided between the courts that are established for the Federation and those for the States. Section 6(1) of the Constitution provides that “The judicial powers of the Federation shall be vested in the courts to which this section relates, being courts established for the Federation.” While Section 6(2) reads “The judicial powers of a State shall be vested in the courts to which this section relates, being courts established, subject as provided by this Constitution, for a State.”
The courts to which are established by the Constitution for the Federation and for the States, are considered as the only superior courts of record in Nigeria; and save as otherwise prescribed by the National Assembly or by the House of Assembly of a State, each court shall have all the powers of a superior court of record.[10] These courts are the Supreme Court of Nigeria; the Court of Appeal; the Federal High Court; the National Industrial Court the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja; the High Court of a State; the Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja; the Sharia Court of Appeal of a State; the Customary Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja; the Customary Court of Appeal of a State. The Judicial Powers vested in the courts extends to the following:[11]
- Shall extend, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this constitution, to all inherent powers and sanctions of a court of law
- Shall extend, to all matters between persons, or between government or authority and to any persons in Nigeria, and to all actions and proceedings relating thereto, for the determination of any question as to the civil rights and obligations of that person;
- Shall not except as otherwise provided by this Constitution, extend to any issue or question as to whether any act of omission by any authority or person or as to whether any law or any judicial decision is in conformity with the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy set out in Chapter II of this Constitution;
- Shall not, as from the date when this section comes into force, extend to any action or proceedings relating to any existing law made on or after 15th January 1966 for determining any issue or question as to the competence of any authority or person to make any such law.
The 1999 Constitution as seen above provided for the Separation of Powers, it made sure that Governmental powers are separated and neatly compartmentalized to avoid interference into the powers of an arm of Government by another. However, despite the clear Separation of Powers between the 3 arms of the Government, interdependence amongst them is important for Checks and Balance. As rightly commented by Ali,[12] “it is pertinent to state that, despite the clear separation of powers provided for under the 1999 constitution, which distinctly made provisions for the respective functions of the three arms of government, interdependence among the aforementioned arms of government is desirable in order to ensure checks and balances. As rightly pointed out that, no man is an island to himself, the legislature, the executive and the judiciary must relate and cross path in the discharge of their functions, toward ensuring smooth governance in the interest of the populace that voted them into power and which must reap the dividends of democracy.”
Conclusion
While Separation of Power is key for the smooth administration of the COnstitution and Nigerian Government. it is said, that no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers.[13] Governmental powers and responsibilities sometimes overlap and are too complex and interrelated to be precisely compartmentalized. As a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict among the branches of Government.
[1] Separation of Powers–An Overview (ncsl.org) assessed 19th May, 2021
[2] Ibid
[3] Separation of Powers in Nigeria: An Anatomy of Power Convergences and Divergences NAUJILJ 9 (1) 2018
[4] (2005) 1 WRN 1 at 64 Per Rhodes – Vivour JSC. See also Gov., Ekiti State (2015) 6 WRN 120 at 160 – 165. Asogwa v Chukwu (2003) 17 WRN 71
[5] Section 4(1) CFRN
[6] Section 4(2) CFRN
[7] Section 4(6) CFRN
[8] Section 5(1)(a) CFRN
[9] Section 5(1)(b) CFRN
[10] Section 6(3) CFRN
[11] Section 6(6) CFRN
[12] Microsoft Word – SEPARATION 1999 CONSTITUTION OF THE.doc (yusufali.net) assessed 1st June, 2021
[13] Supra note 1